tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8899891504265940188.post3448748318798365749..comments2023-05-09T11:55:00.328-04:00Comments on Christianity In History: The Amillennialism of Gregory Thaumaturgus [A.D. 240]Puritan Ladhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02240560332777968090noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8899891504265940188.post-936788980386433212008-10-17T08:16:00.000-04:002008-10-17T08:16:00.000-04:00I think you are quite confused about Romanism and ...I think you are quite confused about Romanism and my purposes for blogging this. The Romanist cult you speak of didn't exist until much later in church history. You'll find nothing in early patristics, or on my blog, defending saint worship, penance, purgatory, indulgences, or cannbalism at the Lord's Supper.<BR/><BR/>Sola Scriptura!!!Puritan Ladhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02240560332777968090noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8899891504265940188.post-70361930685009626032008-10-16T22:06:00.000-04:002008-10-16T22:06:00.000-04:00I'm confused why a puritan would blog icons of sai...I'm confused why a puritan would blog icons of saints, and promote Magisterium. <BR/><BR/>However, I am happy that if a puritan can blog Catholicism, than there is hope for Christianity. <BR/><BR/>PeteAtomicAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com